You have to admire how, when it comes to pushing their
agendas, the American left stays relentlessly on point. Nothing stalls, much
less derails, their locomotive, not even a terrorist act on our own shores. As Mad Men’s adman extraordinaire Don
Draper tells his clients, “If you don’t like the conversation, change it.” The
left doesn’t like the current Boston bombing conversation because it’s about
Islam, their partner in an unholy
alliance; so they quite simply do everything in their power to change it. How?
Let us count the ways.
Blame the right. Immediately
after last week’s Boston Marathon terrorism, the mainstream news media began speculating
that right-wingers were behind the blasts. And by speculating, I mean
demonizing, because that was the left-leaning media’s fervent intent – to not
let the crisis go to waste, to cast suspicion upon the overlapping segments of
society they are hell-bent on “otherizing,” to use their own terminology: law-abiding
Tea Partiers, patriots, veterans, Republicans, the NRA, white people,
Christians. A CNN analyst, to name only one example, focused
the discussion on “right-wing extremists.” More blatantly, Salon put its hateful bigotry on display in an article
entitled, incredibly, “Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white
American.”
Blame the NRA. Once
the ongoing investigation revealed it to be beyond dispute that the terrorists
weren’t Tea Partiers, the left didn’t miss a beat. Even while the remaining
fugitive was still at large, MSNBC’s attack dog Lawrence O’Donnell shamelessly blamed
the National Rifle Association for hindering the investigation by having lobbied
to block a taggant “that would
enable tracing of the purchase of gunpowder”:
The NRA’s effort to guarantee that America's mass murderers are the best
equipped mass murderers in the world is not limited to those who use automatic
weapons and high capacity magazines. The NRA is also in the business of helping
bombers get away with their crimes.
O’Donnell conveniently neglected to mention that an
independent scientific ruling years ago had recommended,
for various reasons, against the use of taggants.
Islam is Innocent.
Another tack the left used is to claim simply that Islam is an irrelevant
factor. The Atlantic posed this
defiantly moronic question: “The
Boston Bombers Were Muslim: So?” Chris Matthews, MSNBC’s longest-running
embarrassment, actually said
“What difference does it make why they did it, if they did it?” Imagine the
spit-flecked accusations this hypocrite would be hurling if the perpetrators
had been Christian. Imagine the broad brush the multiculturalist left, in their
all their non-judgmental tolerance, would be using to smear everyone on the
right.
Melissa Harris-Perry, the race-obsessed
MSNBC host who says
your children don’t belong to you, took the “Islam is irrelevant” argument a
step further by claiming that any attempt to point toward the terrorists’
Muslim nature is “otherizing” them: “Given that they're Chechen, given that
they are literally Caucasian, our very sense of connection to them is this framed up notion of, like, Islam making
them into something that is non-white,” she said inarticulately. What she’s getting
at is that white Americans want to distance themselves from the terrorists by
labeling them – framing them, as she
puts it – as “something that is non-white,” hence Islam. First of all, Islam is
not a race. Second, the only Americans who give a damn what color terrorists
are are the left, because they want
them to be white. Third, denial that the terrorists were carrying out violent
jihad is simply a lie.
The terrorists are
the victims. These kids weren’t radicalized by Islam and al Qaeda, this
theory goes. They placed bombs that killed women and children because they
couldn’t fit in, because they felt alienated from our racist, Islamophobic
society. “To understand the Boston bombers,” mused
a self-hating coward at Slate, “we
need also to understand and be honest about ourselves, the ways in which we
both take in and don’t take in people from other countries, the trickier side
of the American dream.” “Expecting hospitality,” sympathized
an American University professor, “they felt alienated and disillusioned, even
with all of the opportunities and privileges available to them as citizens of
this country.” Those poor terrorists. If only eight-year-old Martin
Richard had made these privileged immigrants from war-torn Chechnya feel
more welcome, perhaps they wouldn’t have blown him and others to smithereens.
We are the real
terrorists. The reprehensible filmmaker Michael Moore tweeted
that, because the terrorists turned out to be American citizens, “the rest of
the world is safe now,” steering the conversation away from jihad’s central
responsibility in worldwide terrorism and toward
the suggestion that America is the
world’s true terrorist. This echoes the very accusation leveled at us by our
most hateful enemies, so Moore has once again proudly shown where his
allegiance lies.
Like 9/11, the Beltway Snipers, the Ft. Hood massacre, the
Little Rock recruiting center murder, and the dozens and dozens of failed or
thwarted plots on American soil, the Boston bombing (and subsequent murder of a
police officer) is about Islam. It’s about two radicalized Muslim-Americans, instructed
by al Qaeda online, and probably assisted by co-conspirators. But the left is
making it about gun control, about NRA obstructionism, about America herself alienating
immigrants, about whites “otherizing” Muslim innocents, about any message that
furthers their nihilistic agendas, because the left knows how to never lose
control of the narrative – a lesson the right would do well to absorb and
emulate.
(This article originally appeared here on FrontPage Mag, 4/25/13)