In a recent
interview, beloved actor Dick Van Dyke, who is currently filming a Mary
Poppins sequel scheduled
for release next year, raised
a concern that the graphic violence and scary intensity of today’s video games
and movies are having a detrimental influence on generations of young viewers.
So many productions
today are “all gunfire and killing,” said Van Dyke. “Violence and entertainment
have almost became interchangeable.” He worries that this toxic ingredient
incites violent behavior and affects impressionable young people who “idolize
it as a romantic way of life.”
“When I was a
teenager,” Van Dyke explained, “I modelled myself after the way Fred Astaire or
Cary Grant dressed. Now kids emulate street gangs. They like to dress like
hoods. That’s just a reversal. They’re picking the wrong role models.”
Van Dyke said that
Walt Disney “would have spoken out about” the explicit nature of some of today’s
entertainment. “Walt said kids like to be scared. It’s a delicious feeling. But
he did it with witches, evil queens and things like that. Now it goes into
blood and violence.” The actor didn’t name specific examples of harmful films, only
that “almost any of them” could be mentioned, even the Harry Potter movies, the
tone of which is a far cry from the joyful innocence of such films as the 1964
classic Mary Poppins in which he starred.
Van Dyke claims he receives
letters from kids as young as eight, who write to him after watching Mary
Poppins. “They ask, ‘Why aren’t there movies like that now? What has
changed?’ Even kids sense that there’s something gone wrong,” he continued. “It’s
all about the money and pandering to the lowest possible taste.”
He has raised such
criticisms with producers, but they are “all in their 20s. They, of course, don’t
think they’re doing any harm.” But Van Dyke insists, “We know that isn’t true. I
remember walking out of movies that were uplifting and feeling inspired. We’d
go to a cowboy movie, we’d come home playing cowboys… All that rubs off on kids.”
Indeed it does, but
the producers of such entertainment will find it easy to dismiss the
91-year-old Van Dyke as just another prudish old-timer complaining about the
younger generation. He’s right, however, as old-timers often are. This is not
to say that entertainment violence alone creates killers, only that
overexposure to extremes of it gradually desensitizes viewers, encourages
aggression, and degrades our cultural standards. People like myself who have
been around long enough have already observed this cultural devolution firsthand;
for younger skeptics like the producers Van Dyke mentions, there are studies
which confirm it.
Most of us, even
cultural conservatives, have simply surrendered to this development as
inevitable. It’s too late to turn back, the argument goes; that horse has left
the barn. The envelope of graphic violence – not to mention graphic sexuality
and moral relativism – has been pushed too far for us to seal it back up and recover
our cultural innocence.
But that is a
defeatism we cannot afford to embrace, nor do we have to. Of course we can recover our innocence, or at least that of future
generations. Once upon a time we had less degraded sensibilities, and some
sense of appropriateness and judgment. Losing that sensibility need not be as irreversible
as losing one’s virginity. As traditionalist Anthony Esolen puts it in his
recent book Out of the Ashes: Rebuilding
American Culture, “We have done it before. We can build it again.”
Turning the ocean
liner of our decadent culture around will require a Herculean effort, but it
can and must be done, for the sake of our children, or at least our children’s
children. “We need to clear out the garbage, admit our errors, and rebuild,”
writes Esolen. “That requires humility, patience, and determination. But
nothing else will do. When your only choices are repentance or oblivion, you
repent. It is time to get to work.”
From Acculturated, 4/20/17