Thanks to Mitt
Romney’s running mate Paul Ryan, America’s curiosity about philosopher-novelist
Ayn Rand has peaked – just in time for the recent release of the second installment
of a trilogy of films based on one of her gargantuan novels of ideas, Atlas Shrugged.
“The reason I got
involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one
person,” Ryan once said, “it would be Ayn Rand.” A potential vice-president
inspired by Rand’s unequivocal, hyper-capitalist, hyper-individualist positions
has galvanized the right about Romney’s campaign and terrified the collectivist
left.
When Atlas Shrugged, Part I opened last year bearing its unapologetically
right-leaning message, it
unsurprisingly took a hammering from left-leaning mainstream movie critics, who
either eagerly pounced on the flick or gave it the silent treatment so as not to bring any attention to it, even the negative
sort. These are the same critics from whom seldom is heard a
discouraging word about movies with heavy-handed progressive messages, such
as Matt Damon’s action flop The Green
Zone or Sean Penn’s preachy, sanctimonious Fair Game, both of which were made
only to push the tired leftist propaganda that we went to war in Iraq on the
basis of a Bush lie.
But the determined producers scraped
up the money for a reportedly even bigger budget for the next round. Part II underwent a complete recasting,
with Samantha Mathis (probably best-known for American Psycho and Broken
Arrow) as Rand’s steel-willed heroine Dagny Taggart and Jason Beghe as her
male counterpart, steel man Henry Reardon.
This time around those same critics are largely ignoring it
– there are fewer than half as many reviews counted on the review site RottenTomatoes.com
as there were for Part I, and they are
almost universally negative (and yet the audience ratings on the site for Part II are 80% positive, because in
this day and age, self-important newspaper critics are no longer necessary or
relevant). “There is almost no media
interest in the movie, and that is no surprise given how the first part was
treated. Hollywood wants it to go away – quickly,” said Dan Gainor, VP of Business and Culture for Media
Research Center. So far the film has pulled in an estimated
nearly $3 million.
[Very mild SPOILERS ahead]
The setting of Atlas Shrugged, Part II is like an
extension of the current economic disaster wrought by President Barack Obama. The
global economy is verging on collapse. Unemployment has skyrocketed to 24%. Gas
is $42 per gallon. Occupy movement-types mill about on the sidewalks, protesting
the 1%ers, and an oppressively bureaucratic government is stifling major
industrialists like Taggart and Reardon, who employ thousands. The country’s
most talented creators and brilliant minds are mysteriously disappearing. Taggart,
COO of the family railroad business, has discovered the prototype of a
revolutionary motor that could provide unlimited energy for the world, but its
inventor too has disappeared. The race is on to find him before her business
goes under.
Meanwhile Henry Rearden
is brought before a government tribunal for defying the newly-enacted “Fair
Share” law by refusing to sell his premium-quality steel to the government. Giving
voice to Ayn Rand’s own philosophy, Rearden shocks the tribunal by forcefully
and articulately defending his belief in the value of pursuing profit for purely
personal reward. Much to the chagrin of these petty government officials, the
people in the vast courtroom loudly support Rearden, and they’re forced to let
him off with a slap on the wrist. However, the government then initiates
martial law, freezes all employment and production, and seizes all patent
rights (“The government takes what it wants and taxes the rest,” one
businessman complains).
All the while,
the mystery question “Who is John Galt?” is on everyone’s lips. Galt is an
almost mythic, Promethean figure who symbolizes the power and glory of the
human mind, standing in contrast to a society that has embraced the stultifying
mediocrity and enforced egalitarianism which author Rand associated with
socialism. Dagny Taggart is about to discover that Galt may be more than just a
mere symbol after all.
[End SPOILERS]
As polarizing as Atlas Shrugged Part II is (it’s unlikely that any Democrats will fill the seats
for it), and with a miniscule advertising budget, the film may not convert any
leftists, but with luck it may sway some undecideds. It will certainly empower
Rand fans and conservative audiences, however, especially as part of a whole
raft of anti-Obama films available now, particularly the astonishingly
successful Dinesh D’Souza’s 2016:
Obama’s America,
which has become the second-biggest money-maker in documentary history. There are
also the Citizens United documentaries Occupy
Unmasked and The Hope and the Change,
and of course Hating Breitbart, which
doesn’t specifically target Obama so much as his Praetorian Guard, the
mainstream media whom the late counterculture conservative Andrew Breitbart
worked tirelessly to expose as a fifth column for Obama.
But Atlas Shrugged Part II is the only fictional film of the bunch, and as Ayn Rand
herself declared, “Fiction is a much more powerful weapon to sell ideas than
nonfiction.” The filmmakers of the Atlas
Shrugged trilogy are hoping that her fiction brought to the big screen will
help sell her ideas and put a positive, conservative influence on what is
arguably the most important election in American history.
(This article originally appeared here on FrontPage Magazine, 10/23/12)