By Jamie Glazov
(Mantua Books, 255 pages, $18.00)
In 2009 Jamie Glazov, managing editor of David Horowitz's Front Page website, released his first book United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror, an incisive, devastating examination of the psychosis behind the Left’s deification of totalitarian ideologies.
Glazov’s timely followup effort is Showdown with Evil: Our Struggle Against Tyranny and Terror, from Mantua Books. Mantua is a Canadian press that describes itself as publishing works “relating to the struggle of the West to preserve its freedoms in the face of Islamo-Fascism,” books that “go beyond the headlines to explore the underlying values and ideologies that explain current politics and culture wars.”
In chapters of easily digestible length, ranging from three to eighteen pages each, Glazov probes the impressive minds of many of today’s most courageous conservative intellects, among them Victor Davis Hanson in “Obama’s Tortured Rendezvous with Reality,” Phyllis Chesler on “the Death of Feminism,” Brigitte Gabriel on “Defeating Radical Islam,” Natan Sharansky, Andy C. McCarthy, Christopher Hitchens, Theodore Dalrymple, Phyllis Chesler, Horowitz himself, even William F. Buckley, Jr. National Review editor Rich Lowry discusses his rollercoaster thriller Banquo’s Ghost. Terrorism expert Steven Emerson exposes the “Grand Deception” of radical Islam’s infiltration of the government and media. Scholar of Islam Robert Spencer addresses the media’s inability to comprehend the Ft. Hood shooting as jihad. And that’s not even half of the contributors.
The chapters are grouped into such topics as “Obama's Destructive Path,” the “Unholy Alliance” (between the Left and Islamofascism), “The Terror War,” and “The Evil Empire” (about Glazov’s homeland Russia , from the Cold War to the present). A section titled “Leaving the Faith” features deeply personal and intellectually honest tales of political conversion from Left to Right by novelist-screenwriter Andrew Klavan, former Palestinian terrorist Walid Shoebat, and Hollywood blogger Charles Winecoff. Although one of the lesser-known contributors to Showdown, Winecoff opens up about “coming out” as a gay conservative in one of the most unique and articulate pieces in the book.
Each section is capably and briefly introduced by David Swindle, the smart young editor of Horowitz's NewsReal Blog. In a concluding section called “Looking to the Future of Freedom,” Swindle also conducts the thirtieth interview, of Glazov himself. Glazov, whose experience with totalitarianism derives from his own parents’ struggles as Soviet dissidents, is no less honest and passionate an interview subject than the others.
It is that moral and intellectual passion and curiosity that enables Glazov to interview his subjects in a way that more resembles a deeply engaging meeting of the minds than a dry, perfunctory question-and-answer session. He plays Dante to Mohammad Asghar’s Virgil in a tour through Islamic heaven and hell, spars respectfully with iconoclastic atheist Hitchens, then engages in a light, feisty exchange with firebrand Ann Coulter (is she ever anything less than feisty?). Throughout, Glazov never fails to draw out the best from his formidable guests.
Showdown abounds with gems like this one from Klavan, describing the religion of the left as “an elaborate system for hiding shame behind a cheap mask of virtue.” David Horowitz elaborates on that in his own thoughts on leftism as religion: “The left is really a crypto-religion; it is a collective delusion. It is based on the inability of its adherents to come to terms with the real world, the actually existing world, with their own mortality, with human limits.”
In a collection of this sort, one would ordinarily expect some peaks and valleys in quality. Here there are no dips in quality (with the possible exception of Dalrymple’s disappointing contribution about opiate addiction, which I found less relevant to the book’s themes), only in length: a very few pieces are frustratingly short, such as Norman Podhoretz’s discussion of his book World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism, in which he sets out to make “a full-throated, whole-hearted statement of the case for the Bush Doctrine” and remind its detractors “how World War IV started, what the stakes are, and why we have to win.” Or Hanson’s discussion of what Glazov calls the Obama administration’s “dance with denial” about our Islamist enemy. Such offerings left me wanting more – which ultimately is more of a compliment than a criticism.
(This article originally appeared at World Net Daily here, 3/5/11)